Ansicht
Dokumentation
00305 - to LPAR or not to LPAR???
rdisp/max_wprun_time - Maximum work process run time General Data in Customer MasterThis documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
to LPAR or not to LPAR???
Jack,The use of LPAR can significantly reduce your software and hardware
expense, both initially and annually (as you only pay for 1 copy of OS/400,
have only 1 software subscription, and pay hardware maintenance on only 1
system. Your initial cost may be higher due to the larger system, disk, and
accessory components (LPAR does not share very well at this time). LPAR
under V5R1M0 is supposed to be much better, CPU's can be divided into 10ths
(if needed), components are shared more and changes can be made dynamically
without an IPL.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Pim [mailto:jackpimZh...]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:18 PM
To: sap400Zm...
Subject: to LPAR or not to LPAR???
Hello All,
I have a question as to everyone's opinion on the configuration of a
DEV/QAS box. I see customers buying a DEV/QAS boxes then using LPAR's to
split it up. Why not just install two system like we did before LPARs???
Memory and processors are sitting there unused when the other system is
busy??? Curios to know other peoples thoughts??
Jack Pim
Technical Consultant
SAP America
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Durban Tours - Südafrika Safari
General Material Data Addresses (Business Address Services)
This documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
Length: 1978 Date: 20240420 Time: 071235 sap01-206 ( 2 ms )
