Ansicht
Dokumentation
09391 - Tape Drives
ABAP Short Reference SUBST_MERGE_LIST - merge external lists to one complete list with #if... logic for R3upThis documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
Tape Drives
We have the 3584 LTO with 4 drives and we are using this unit for at least 8months now and it is an excellent unit. We're in the processes of using this
unit to backup our Intel infrastructure. The only bad thing about it is you
can only connect the drive to one system and it's not the same as our 3590
with 2 channel.
Regards,
Ramon,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rooyen Tom van [SMTP:tvroZoce.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:03 AM
> To: 'DoNotReply@consolut.eu'
> Subject: RE: Tape Drives
>
> We have two 3581 drives since july 2002 and have in total had four or five
> replacement units (I loose count). The errors we usually get are 'Rear tape
> error'. New units usually solve the problems, microcode changes do not. The
> replaced units probably get fixed and sent to a new customer?
> We usually are able to get the tapes unloaded using the control panel.
>
> While the units perform ok they are not very fault tolerant.
>
> regards,
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Louis.ForeeZctacalign.com [mailto:Louis.ForeeZctacalign.com]
> Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 9:50
> To: DoNotReply@consolut.eu
> Subject: RE: Tape Drives
>
>
> Good of you to ask as I'd been wanting to start about them too ... but from
> a different perspective, unfortunately.
>
> We've been using the 3581-H17 autoloader (7 tapes) since half a year now.
> They were quite a leap compared to the MagStar before it. From over 6 hours
> and 7 tapes back to just 2 hours and 1 tape for PRD backup (database size
> around 170 Gb now).
>
> The one bad point we're experiencing with them is regular mechanical
> failures when the tapes get moved around with a tape actually getting
> "stuck" somehow. Luckily most of these occurred on the DEV/QAS machine and
> not on PRD so far. Unit has been replaced once but no better behaviour
> after
> that, it still happens around once a month at least up till now. The person
> changing the tapes has learned from the IBM service engineer how to get it
> unstuck using a paperclip and some properly used force ... 😎
>
> Would like to hear from others using same unit if we're just the
> statistical
> unlucky or if this is indeed inherent to those units?
>
> Regards, Louis.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anderson, Doreen [mailto:dandersoZballhort.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 februari 2003 21:47
> To: DoNotReply@consolut.eu
> Subject: Tape Drives
>
>
> Does anyone have experience/comments with the 358x LTO Gen 2 tape
> drives? They are supposed to achieve 105MBps at a 3:1 data compaction.
>
> If you do, what model are you running?
>
> Are you also backing up all the Intel/network servers on the floor?
>
>
>
> We've used 3590 E11 for a few years and have been very happy - but we're
> looking for even fast save times especially since PRD DB is at 420GB
>
> We don't have a large investment of vaulted / archived 3590 media (other
> than full system saves) so we are in a position to change the media
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Doreen
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Have a look to our homepage at: http://www.consolut.net
> DoNotReply@consolut.eu
>
> Your use of consolut is subject to http://www.consolut.net
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Have a look to our homepage at: http://www.consolut.net
> DoNotReply@consolut.eu
>
> Your use of consolut is subject to http://www.consolut.net
>
>
>
>
>
> Have a look to our homepage at: http://www.consolut.net
> DoNotReply@consolut.eu
>
> Your use of consolut is subject to http://www.consolut.net
>
>
Durban Tours - Südafrika Safari
CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES - Frontend Services SUBST_MERGE_LIST - merge external lists to one complete list with #if... logic for R3up
This documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
Length: 6294 Date: 20240420 Time: 051636 sap01-206 ( 3 ms )
