Ansicht
Dokumentation

09398 - Tape Drives

09398 - Tape Drives

BAL Application Log Documentation   Vendor Master (General Section)  
This documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
SAP E-Book

Tape Drives

Thank you for all the feedback from everyone!

We've used 3590 B11 & then E11 for 6 years - so I wanted to challenge
whether the "newer" LTO gen 2 technology might prove more efficient but
the last thing I want to do is provide speed at the cost of integrity.


Doreen

-----Original Message-----
From: Andi.MerchantZNorthern-foods.co.uk
[mailto:Andi.MerchantZNorthern-Foods.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:41 AM
To: 'DoNotReply@consolut.eu'
Subject: RE: Tape Drives

Hi Doreen,

We use 3590's (E11's currently, looking to upgrade to H11's)

From a personal view I don't like the LTO. Although they do write data
incredibly quickly, the data verification on them isnt a match to a
3590.
Also, the 3590 will recover a lot more data errors before issuing a
media
error, where as the LTO will error very quickly... also, looking around,
the
Hardware doesn't seem too fantastic from a reliability perspective.

Currently, we use one 3590 to backup 700Gb machine (Save 21 every
night),
which takes about 4.5hrs... we are starting to investigate the use of
BRMS &
paralleling tape units.

You can go down to object level "spreading" and Im told that the
reduction
in backup time to tape units ratio is very linear, ie 2 units will half
your
backup time, 4 will quarter it. Only problem I see with this is that the
restore would be very messy if you didn't have the same number of tape
units
on your restore box, as you would need to perform a tape change for
every
object (somewhere in the region of 15000 on our box)

Sorry to ramble on, just my thoughts

Best regards

Andi



-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson, Doreen [mailto:dandersoZballhort.com]
Sent: 18 February 2003 20:47
To: DoNotReply@consolut.eu
Subject: Tape Drives

Does anyone have experience/comments with the 358x LTO Gen 2 tape
drives? They are supposed to achieve 105MBps at a 3:1 data compaction.

If you do, what model are you running?

Are you also backing up all the Intel/network servers on the floor?



We've used 3590 E11 for a few years and have been very happy - but we're
looking for even fast save times especially since PRD DB is at 420GB

We don't have a large investment of vaulted / archived 3590 media (other
than full system saves) so we are in a position to change the media





Thanks!

Doreen





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Have a look to our homepage at: http://www.consolut.net
DoNotReply@consolut.eu

Your use of consolut is subject to
http://www.consolut.net



**********************************************************************
The information included in this e-mail is of a confidential nature
and is intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended
addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution by you is
prohibited and may be unlawful. Disclosure to any party other than
the addressee, whether inadvertent or otherwise is not intended to
waive the privilege or confidentiality.

Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free from
any virus, or other defect which might affect any system into which
they are received or opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that they are virus free and to check that they will not
adversely affect its systems and data. No responsibility is accepted
by Northern Foods PLC for any loss or damage arising in any way from
their receipt, opening or use.
**********************************************************************


Have a look to our homepage at: http://www.consolut.net
DoNotReply@consolut.eu

Your use of consolut is subject to
http://www.consolut.net




Durban Tours - Südafrika Safari

rdisp/max_wprun_time - Maximum work process run time   Fill RESBD Structure from EBP Component Structure  
This documentation is copyright by SAP AG.

Length: 5517 Date: 20240329 Time: 080108     sap01-206 ( 4 ms )