Ansicht
Dokumentation
12352 - Recommendations for patchlevels of binary patches on iseries/Windows-Appl.
PERFORM Short Reference BAL_S_LOG - Application Log: Log header dataThis documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
Recommendations for patchlevels of binary patches on iseries/Windows-Appl.
Hello Niko,all info I have is note 684835. This feature is currently not yet available for
newer releases, but it is planned to become available. I do not know when.
Please check this note regularly...
Viele Grüße / Kind Regards
Christian Hoelters
Development Manager
SAP NetWeaver on IBM eServer iSeries
Tel.: +49-6227-7-44189
e-mail: christian.hoeltersZsap.com
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: niko_schmitz [mailto:nschmitzZgibmbh.de]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2003 10:23
An: DoNotReply@consolut.eu
Betreff: WG: Re: Recommendations for patchlevels of binary
patches on iseries/Windows-Appl.
Hello Christian,
in note 138704 i saw that 46D_EXT is still in preparation.
Do you know if this feature is implemented in 620? I take care of a
620-installation, but I didn't recognize anything like that yet.
There's a little information about the the feature 'rolling upgrade'
in note 156557, but no details.
Greeting,
Niko Schmitz/gib
--- In DoNotReply@consolut.eu, "Hoelters, Christian"
<christian.hoeltersZs...> wrote:
> Hello Niko,
>
> as far as I know SAP will provide the feature "rolling kernel
update" on the basis of the the 4.6D_EXT kernels (I don't know, if it
will be there right from the beginning of the availability of these
kernels, though...).
> With this feature it will be possible to update the kernel on one
application server while all the other application servers will be
active. The use of this feature surely will have some preconditions.
For details please do a notes search for these key words, since I do
not know yet where it is described.
>
> When you use this feature and do a rolling kernel upgrade the
appserver will not come up, iff the kernel is not compatible with the
others in use. Reading between the lines this means, that SAP knows,
which kernel patch levels do work together and which ones do not.
Looks like starting from 4.6D_EXT on the problem should be solved.
>
>
> Viele Grüße / Kind Regards
>
> Christian Hoelters
> Development Manager
> SAP NetWeaver on IBM eServer iSeries
> Tel.: +49-6227-7-44189
> e-mail: christian.hoeltersZs...
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: niko_schmitz [mailto:nschmitzZg...]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2003 10:03
> An: DoNotReply@consolut.eu
> Betreff: Re: Recommendations for patchlevels of
binary patches on iseries/Windows-Appl.
>
> Hi Volker,
>
> thank you for the reply.
> Once again the basis administrators have to find
> out the right combination of binary patches for their
> systems.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Niko
>
> P.S.
> With application servers running under WIN2003 the memory limitation
> for the total SAP buffer size of approx. 1,2GB disappeared. 3GB-
> Option has been set.
> --- In DoNotReply@consolut.eu, "Volker Gueldenpfennig"
> <volker.gueldenpfennigZs...> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't know of any "official" thing.
> >
> > But, it is clear, that both patches need to be "as similar" as
> > possible. There it is not of any interest if the iSeries patch is
> > higher or the windows patch. Just take that what you can find on
> the
> > SMP - mostly this is not exact in sync.
> >
> > The simple reason:
> > In general it would be not of any interest at all when no changes
> > were done in special structures, that go from appl-server to appl-
> > server or are stored in the DB.
> > But, unfortunately this happens sometimes with special patches.
(I
> > think with about 1498 we changed the dynpro version) This had a
> > pretty bad result for customers with NT below this and iSeries
> above
> > or vice versa, because it always started regenerating with the
> > performance and SQL0913 problems, that are a result of this.
> > Here you can see, that it does make no difference what system
would
> > have been higher.
> > As soon as the patch number is not the same, there is ALWAYS a
> slight
> > risk, that you run into such an issue ...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Volker
> >
> > --- In DoNotReply@consolut.eu, "niko_schmitz"
<nschmitzZg...>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello group,
> > >
> > > does anybody know about official SAP recommendations regarding
> the
> > > patchlevels of binary patches on an iSeries central instance
> > compared
> > > to the patchlevels on the associated Windows application
servers?
> > > I only know about the inofficial statement that the patchlevels
> on
> > > the Windows application servers should not be higher than the
> > > patchlevels on the central instance.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your help,
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > >
> > > Niko Schmitz
> > > gib mbH
>
>
>
> Have a look to our homepage at: http://www.consolut.net
> DoNotReply@consolut.eu
>
> Your use of consolut is subject to
http://www.consolut.net
Have a look to our homepage at: http://www.consolut.net
DoNotReply@consolut.eu
Your use of consolut is subject to http://www.consolut.net
Durban Tours - Südafrika Safari
SUBST_MERGE_LIST - merge external lists to one complete list with #if... logic for R3up RFUMSV00 - Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases
This documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
Length: 7618 Date: 20240423 Time: 132651 sap01-206 ( 4 ms )
