Ansicht
Dokumentation
02354 - File TCDCOUPLES?
TXBHW - Original Tax Base Amount in Local Currency SUBST_MERGE_LIST - merge external lists to one complete list with #if... logic for R3upThis documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
File TCDCOUPLES?
Hey Jim.Were any transports done yesterday/last nite that had table changes in it?
Of what about hot packs?
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Doll [mailto:jdollZperrigo.com]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 8:42 AM
To: sap400Zmag.linz.at
Subject: File TCDCOUPLES?
We have a situation that I wondered if anyone is familiar with. My OSS link
is down at the moment, but I may end up there, too.
We wrote a transaction ZADJ to frontend transaction MB11. In 3.1H, we used
an option "skipping first screen" to bypass the authority check on MB11
(users have authority to ZADJ, but not MB11).
For 4.6C, we had to omit "skipping first screen", but it ran fine for over a
month. In the middle of the day yesterday, people began getting
authorization errors running ZADJ, saying that they didn't have authority to
MB11.
After some tracing and some experimentation, we found table TCDCOUPLES, that
has a "calling" and a "called" transaction, and whether to check security or
not. Transaction SE97 is used to maintain this table, but this morning I
checked and found no uses of SE97 yesterday.
I did look through the journal receiver entries, and found many adds and a
few changes to TCDCOUPLES, including an add for a record for ZADJ/MB11 just
before the error started happening.
We can't find any security changes or config that would have affected this.
Anyone have any ideas?
Jim Doll, baffled BASISist
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
SAP on System i-unsubscribeZegroups.com
Your use of consolut is subject to http://www.consolut.net
Durban Tours - Südafrika Safari
Fill RESBD Structure from EBP Component Structure Vendor Master (General Section)
This documentation is copyright by SAP AG.
Length: 2517 Date: 20240601 Time: 224650 sap01-206 ( 3 ms )
